Welcome to the forum
Alberto Contador doping ban only a proposal - UCI
either they impose or it is all a nonsense....looks bad for Armstrong too....Contador's was an infinitesimal trace, but it still measured so it was there.........can we ever really hope for a truly clean sport or should we just shrug and get on as best we can hoping the authorities keep the pressure on and promoters also as they prefer their products shown to best effect by clean cyclists
Comments
If Contador was intentionally doping, which I think is highly likely, then even allowing for the fact that Shleck must be a great athlete, would a clean rider be able to finish just 39 seconds behind a doped one?
If second place is doped up, would a clean Menchov be able to finish just two minutes and one second in third behind the two dopers...
How many amateurs have said 'try this new energy drink it really works and makes you go that much quicker/longer etc?
Is that not where it starts????
touch paper lit ;-)
PS - Contador doped and has done for years!!!
Riders dope for the prestige (witness british amateurs using epo) and the money and career gains, they dont dope because the event is too hard. Or at least if it is too hard its because all the other riders are doping not the difficulty of the event itself.
The logical conclusion of making stage races easier is to have 3 weeks of 100metre sprints everyday. If this was still the worlds biggest annual sporting event and a stage win meant a guaranteed carreer and multi million pound contract then the riders would absolutely dope. Look at all the doping in athletics. no one doped in a 100m running sprint because it was too difficult an event, they dope because they want to win.
I dont know what the answer is, but making races like the tour easier is not it. The big tours must remain long, arduous and mountainous thats the whole point.
now, about those jelly babies...